From the Telegraph (U.K.), an interview with Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury:
. . . "Is our society broken? I think it is," he says. "We are in a phase of our culture where the fragmentation of society is far more obvious. It's not just families, it is different ethnic communities and economic groups. We talk about access and equality the whole time, but in practice we all seem to live very segregated lives.". . .
. . . Broadcasters, he argues, are contributing to the moral decline. "There is a gladiatorial streak in the entertainment business now where increasingly humiliation is the way forward. That worries me, there is a kind of sadism that can't be good for us. It is the building-up and the pulling-down of contestants, it is pushing people into situations where they expose their vulnerability, encouraging a culture of shamelessness."
One of the Archbishop's key concerns is how the society we live in is damaging children. "What is lacking in children's lives is space. They are pressed into a testing culture, or even into a gang culture, they are bullied and manipulated until they fit in, they never have any time to develop in their own space."
He understands the urge to join a gang. "A lot of it is yearning for love, they want to fit in, if their families are as chaotic as some of them are, gangs give them a sense of belonging."
But he says pushy parents who rush children between ballet and violin lessons are suffocating their offspring too. "Children live crowded lives, we're not making their lives easy by pressurising them, whether it's the claustrophobia of gang culture or the claustrophobia of intense achievement in middle-class areas."
Another concern is the paranoia surrounding children. "We have got obsessional about paedophiles," he says. "A generation ago people would have smiled rather wryly about a scoutmaster or a schoolteacher caught in some improper activity, now we know the damage. I doubt that there are more people with perversions, we are just more aware of it. That is right but unfortunately it also carries the wrong kind of awareness and people have become overprotective towards children, they are stifling them in a different way.". . .
. . . When we ask whether [the Archbishop] thinks a Presbyterian Prime Minister will be different to a high Anglican, he says: "The kind of political culture that Gordon Brown has come through is a bit more austere and values-oriented. He has a real level of emotional commitment about global poverty. I'm pleased that one of the first things he did was to reverse the legislation about gambling, and the hint that they might be looking again at 24-hour drinking."
Now he hopes Mr Brown will reduce the abortion time limit. "The nation generally is getting more unhappy about the high level of abortion in this country, people are not happy about abortion as a back-stop to contraception," he says.
The Government needs to enforce strict controls on stem cell research too. "I can't come to terms with the idea of a human individual being created for a purpose," he says.
And he intends to speak out on euthanasia. "I'm against it - morally and religiously because I don't believe any of us has the liberty to determine the day of our death, and practically because almost all forms of legislation for assisted dying open the door to unjust and destructive pressures on people."
We have spent so long discussing the morality of politics that we have barely touched on the politics of the Church. Why is it so obsessed by gay priests?
"I don't think it's just an obsession with sex," he sighs. "It's about the authority of the Bible.
"Generally we're seeing a reworking of that - it's an area of real anxiety and for some people this is a step too far."
He does not know if he can stop the church breaking apart. "I hope it won't," he says. I'm working very hard to stop that happening.". . .
Read it all.