Thursday, November 08, 2007

ECUSA: Fort Worth bishop receives notice of possible consequences if withdrawal effort continues

From EpiscopalLife Online [boldface mine]:

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori has made public another letter of warning sent to a bishop actively seeking to withdraw his diocese from the Episcopal Church.

The letter to Bishop Jack Leo Iker of the Diocese of Fort Worth notifies him that such a step would force her to take action to bring the diocese and its leadership into line with the mandates of the national Church.

The first of the letters was sent to Bishop Robert Duncan of the Diocese of Pittsburgh on October 31. Letters to other bishops will follow.

Fort Worth's diocesan convention, meeting November 16-17, is set to consider the first reading of a constitutional amendment that would remove accession to the Constitution and Canons of General Convention, as well as several canonical amendments that eliminate mention of the Episcopal Church. Iker has indicated his support and approval of the amendments.

A similar canonical change was approved on first reading by the Diocese of Pittsburgh's convention November 2-3, despite a warning letter written by Jefferts Schori to Pittsburgh's bishop.

In December, the Diocese of San Joaquin is scheduled to hear the second and final reading of its constitutional accession amendment.

If these and related constitutional changes go forward, the Presiding Bishop could ask the Title IV Review Committee to consider whether the bishops who have proposed and supported them have abandoned the communion of the Episcopal Church. . .

A lawsuit would be filed against the departed leadership and a representative sample of departing congregations if they attempted to retain Episcopal Church property.

Appointed to the 2007-2009 Title IV Review Committee are Bishop Dorsey Henderson of Upper South Carolina (president), Bishop Suffragan Bavi E. Rivera of Olympia, Bishop Suffragan David C. Jones of Virginia, Bishop C. Wallis Ohl Jr. of Northwest Texas, the Rev. Carolyn Kuhr of Montana, the Very Rev. Scott Kirby of Eau Claire, J.P. Causey Jr. of Virginia and Deborah J. Stokes of Southern Ohio.

Read it all.
H/t to Stand Firm.

A time to scatter stones and a time to gather them

[God] has made everything beautiful in its time. He has also set eternity in the hearts of men; yet they cannot fathom what God has done from beginning to end. I know that there is nothing better for men than to be happy and do good while they live. That everyone may eat and drink, and find satisfaction in all his toil — this is the gift of God. I know that everything God does will endure forever; nothing can be added to it and nothing taken from it. God does it so that men will revere him.
Ecclesiastes 3:11-14

The "stones" have been scattered across ECUSA. I pray that this is now the time of gathering them back together under committed leadership, for God's glory in Christ Jesus.

Shoe Thursday: Party Time! Disco Inferno!

Hey, we have a great reason to celebrate! So let's dress the part (at least the guys - I really don't want to see what the gals were wearing in 1975).


Muchissimo thanks to ++Gregory Venables, ++Henry Orombi, ++Peter Akinola, and all the other committed Anglican Primates that have given us so much of their time, resources, and understanding to provide us with safe haven in the Anglican Communion. Of course, there's a lot of hard work and sacrifice ahead, but for today, let's enjoy!

So to put us in the party mood, here's Kool & the Gang:

Celebrate good times, come on ! Let's celebrate

There's a party going on right here
a celebration to last throughout the years.
So bring your good times and your laughter
too

we're gonna celebrate your party with you !

let's all celebrate and have a good time!

(photo from the 1975 J.C. Penny catalog, courtesy of the Manolo)

Anglican leader offers haven to US conservatives

Boy, you go to sleep for a few hours, and see what happens! From the Telegraph (U.K.):

The worldwide Anglican Church suffered a dramatic new split last night when a leading conservative archbishop approved plans to adopt breakaway American dioceses, the Daily Telegraph has learned.

Archbishop Gregory Venables is to allow conservative dioceses that are defecting from the pro-gay American branch of Anglicanism to affiliate with his South American province thousands of miles away.

The unprecedented realignment will rock the 70 million-strong worldwide Church and escalate the bitter civil war over gay clergy that is tearing it apart.

It will also dismay the Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, who is struggling to avert a formal schism.

Dr Williams is certain come under huge pressure to denounce what liberals will regard as an illicit “parallel” province.

But if he does he will risk the wrath of the powerful coalition of conservative Global South primates from Africa and Asia who are backing the initiative.

He is already facing threats of a conservative boycott of next year's showcase Lambeth Conference in Canterbury if he fails to discipline the liberal Americans over their pro-gay policies.

Global South leaders yesterday stepped up pressure on Dr Williams to postpone the conference, the ten-yearly gathering of Anglican bishops from across the globe, until the row has been resolved.

The crisis could deepen even further if the Diocese of Chicago elects a lesbian cathedral dean to be its next bishop at the weekend.

Archbishop Venables said that the Americans were to blame for triggering the crisis by consecrating Anglicanism's first openly gay bishop in 2003 in defiance of official Church policy.

The British-born Archbishop, who is the Primate of the Province of the Southern Cone, told the Telegraph: "This is a pivotal moment in the history of the Anglican Communion.

"The new realignment demonstrates the depths of the divisions that already exist."

Dr Williams appears to want to keep the Communion together at all costs, but Gospel truth should never be sacrificed for structural unity.

"Conservatives in America and elsewhere cannot wait in limbo any longer. They need a safe haven now."

Archbishop Venables unveiled the decision of his bishops and other leaders after the plans were overwhelmingly approved by his provincial synod during a meeting in Chile last night.

A handful of conservative American dioceses are already in the process of opting out of the Episcopal Church by voting in their diocesan synods to alter their constitutions.

Up to five are expected to become part of the Southern Cone, which covers most of South America except Brazil, over the next six months or so. . .

In a letter sent last night, 46 conservative members of the Church of England's General Synod pledged their support. A number of traditionalist parishes in Canada are also likely to affiliate with the Southern Cone province in protest at plans by liberal dioceses to introduce same-sex blessings.

Read it all.

Wednesday, November 07, 2007

Disciplinary action proceeding against three resigned bishops

From the Living Church:

The House of Bishops is proceeding with disciplinary action against three of the six bishops who have resigned from The Episcopal Church during the past year. The bishops were briefed on active cases during an executive session of the fall meeting held Sept. 20-25 in New Orleans.

An ecclesiastical trial against the Rt. Rev. William Cox is still pending, despite the fact that he transferred to the Anglican Church of Southern Cone last March. Bishop Cox told The Living Church he was not aware that he was still a target of interest to the ecclesiastical court. . .

Disciplinary investigations of the Rt. Rev. Andrew Fairfield, retired Bishop of North Dakota, and the Rt. Rev. David Bena, former Bishop Suffragan of Albany, are in process. Last June, Bishop Fairfield transferred to the Church of Uganda. Shortly before his own renunciation last January, the Rt. Rev. Daniel Herzog, former Bishop of Albany, approved the transfer of Bishop Bena’s episcopal orders to the Anglican Church of Nigeria.

Like Bishop Herzog, the Rt. Rev. Clarence Pope, retired Bishop of Fort Worth, and the Rt. Rev. Jeffrey N. Steenson, Bishop of the Rio Grande, renounced and subsequently sought to join the Roman Catholic Church.

The canons of The Episcopal Church require bishops to receive permission to resign from a majority of bishops with jurisdiction. Bishops Herzog, Pope and Steenson did request and receive such approval. Bishops Bena, Cox and Fairfield wrote Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori informing her of their transfers, but they did not request approval for their actions from the House of Bishops. . .

Read it all.

'The Golden Compass' does not point to True North

From Ben Witherington's blog, a review of The Golden Compass, a movie based on Philip Pullman's first novel in his trilogy titled His Dark Materials (read especially if you're a parent) [boldface mine]:

I am not a person that is much in favor of banning things. For one thing it usually backfires (although the banning of the 'Da Vinci Code' movie after a brief release in China, seems to have accomplished some of the government's aims to avoid religious upheaval). Plus I do indeed believe in those amendments, including free speech.

However I continue to get red alerts from persons on both sides of the Atlantic pond that Phillip Pullman is not an author you want young Christian children to read or spend time with.Www.snopes.com/ reports that Pullman, in an interview with the Aussie paper The Sydney Morning Herald in 2003 said that his books are about "killing God".

Peter Hitchens, a British commentator, (no relation to the atheist of the same name) [ed. correction - Peter is Christopher Hitchens' brother] calls Pullman the most dangerous author in Britain. Whether dangerous or not, he is certainly popular, and his novels have won various awards. The first in the trilogy we are concerned with, called 'Northern Lights' has now been made into a movie entitled 'Golden Compass' and released just in time for the Christmas rush season. Hollywood can of course do what it wants, but Christians have no obligation to support films with an atheistic, or better said strongly anti-theist point of view. Below you will find what the Catholic League says about the matter:
". . . A film called "The Golden Compass" opens December 7. It is based on the first book of a trilogy titled His Dark Materials. The author of this children's fantasy is Philip Pullman, a noted English atheist. It is his objective to bash Christianity and promote atheism. To kids. "The Golden Compass" is a film version of the book by that name, and it is being toned down so that Catholics, as well as Protestants, are not enraged.

The second book of the trilogy, The Subtle Knife, is more overt in its hatred of Christianity than the first book, and the third entry, The Amber Spyglass, is even more blatant. Because "The Golden Compass" is based on the least offensive of the three books, and because it is being further watered down for the big screen, some might wonder why parents should be wary of the film.

The Catholic League wants Christians to stay away from this movie precisely because it knows that the film is bait for the books: unsuspecting parents who take their children to see the movie may be impelled to buy the three books as a Christmas present. And no parent who wants to bring their children up in the faith will want any part of these books.

"The Golden Compass: Agenda Unmasked" is the Catholic League's response. It provides information about the film, "The Golden Compass," and details what book reviewers have said about Pullman's books; a synopsis of his trilogy is also included. . .

Read it all.

How to assist the Diocese of Pittsburgh

From Jackie Bruchi at Stand Firm:

The following is an email I received from Peter Frank, Director of Communication for the Diocese of Pittsburgh in response to my letter to him advising that many of our readers desired to assist Bishop Duncan and the Diocese in the battle ahead. My request stated that we are already praying for them and asked for specifics of how else we can help. Here is the response:
Assisting the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh,

We are so thankful for the support Anglicans and other Christians from all over the world have already offered to the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh over the last few years. In the aftermath of big meetings and big decisions we hear over and over again that people are praying for us and support us.

Stand Firm has brought it to our attention that some are looking for ways to also help financially. Since 2003, the diocese has faced significant legal costs. We have already had to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to defend ourselves. To make sure that paying those costs does not force us to curtail parish and diocesan mission; we have created a “Mission Support Fund.” Since it was founded earlier this year, donors have given some $60,000.

If you would like to give to this fund, send a check made out to The Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh with Mission Support Fund in the memo line to:

The Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh
900 Oliver Building
535 Smithfield St.
Pittsburgh, PA 15222

Gifts are tax deductible (we will send you a receipt). On behalf of Bishop Robert Duncan and all of us here in Pittsburgh, thank you again for your past support and willingness to stand with us now during these challenging days. “Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us” (Hebrews 12:1).

Peter Frank
Director of Communications

At this time the Diocese does not have a PayPal link. If that changes, I will do my best to let you know. In the meantime, may I suggest you place Bishop Duncan and the Diocese of Pittsburgh in your prayers and consider a donation to this worthwhile cause?

Liverpool: Black and white

Anglican Cathedral, Liverpool; photo credit Brian Saville

Open letter to the Primates from Archbishop Akinola

From the Church of Nigeria, Anglican Communion, an open letter from Archbishop Akinola to his fellow primates [boldface mine]:

. . . I write on the 490th anniversary of that moment in Church history when Martin Luther nailed his 95 theses to the door of the Cathedral in Wittenberg in which he asserted, among other things, that the truth of the gospel must always take precedence over the structures of the church. It is becoming increasingly clear that we are facing a similar situation today. While it has been my hope that we would be able to share these reflections face to face it seems unlikely that we will be called to meet together in the near future and so I offer these thoughts by letter.

It has been repeatedly stated and most succinctly summarized in the report, 'Road to Lambeth' we face a two fold crisis in the Anglican Communion: a crisis of doctrine and a crisis of leadership, in which the failure of the “Instruments” of the Communion to exercise discipline has called into question the viability of the Anglican Communion as a united Christian body under the common foundation of faith. (See the Chicago-Lambeth Quadrilateral)

The Church of Nigeria is not interested in territorial expansion. The failure to resolve these dual crises has been at the heart of the decision by our Church and a number of other Global South Provinces to offer encouragement and oversight to a growing number of clergy and congregations in the USA. These pastoral initiatives are not and should not be seen as the cause of the crises.

Although they have variously been described as “interventions” “boundary crossing” or “incursions” -- they are a direct and natural consequence of the decision by The Episcopal Church (TEC) to follow the path that it has now chosen.

These pastoral initiatives undertaken to keep faithful Anglicans within our Anglican family has been at a considerable cost of crucial resources to our province. There is no moral equivalence between them and the actions taken by TEC. They are a heartfelt response to cries for help. We acted in accordance with the Gospel mandate. Had TEC, against all godly warnings, not taken actions that tore the fabric of our beloved Communion there would be no need for hundreds indeed, thousands of its members to seek pastoral, episcopal and now primatial care elsewhere.

It has been suggested that our actions violate historic Anglican polity and early church tradition with particular reference made to the Council of Nicea. This assertion is both hollow and made in bad faith since those who make it are more than willing to ignore historic biblical teaching on the uniqueness of Christ, the authority of the Scriptures and the call to moral obedience. With regard to Nicea - while there was concern for proper order there was even greater commitment to maintaining right teaching. This can be seen by the provision of godly bishops and clergy in places where the incumbents were proponents of false teaching.

The world needs to understand that the situation that we now confront is not primarily about structure or conferences but about irreconcilable truth claims. It is worth remembering that in the Biblical narratives religious structures have often been the enemy of revealed truth. When these structures become obstacles, YHWH, in his own way and at a time of his own choosing removed them and brought His people back to Himself. Of course there is value to preserving Anglican structures but we must never do so at the expense of the people for whom our Lord Jesus the Christ gave his life.

Until the Communion summons the courage to tackle that issue headlong and resolve it we can do no other than provide for those who cry out to us. It is our earnest prayer that repentance and reconciliation will make this a temporary arrangement. One thing is clear we will not abandon our friends.

When we met in Dar es Salaam, after a great deal of effort, we suggested a way forward that had the support of all those present – including the Presiding Bishop of TEC. The House of Bishops and Executive Committee of The Episcopal Church quickly rejected this proposal on the grounds that it apparently violated their canons. We now have a counter proposal from TEC and yet there is no indication that it will meet the needs of those for whom it is supposedly designed. This endless series of proposals and counter proposals continues with no apparent conclusion in sight. Sadly, it is becoming increasingly clear that the only acceptable end as far as TEC is concerned is the full capitulation of any who would stand in opposition to their biblically incompatible innovations- this we will never do. There is a way forward - we have written and spoken repeatedly about it – the time for action is now.

I believe that we Primates must meet in the next few months to respond to the crisis that now confronts us. The situation in The Episcopal Church is deteriorating rapidly. Lawsuits are escalating and I have just heard that Bishop Bob Duncan is now threatened with ecclesiastical trial by the Presiding Bishop for his faithful attempts to find a way to protect his faithful members and diocese. Other godly bishops are under the same threat. Their only crime is a desire to continue their Christian pilgrimage as faithful Anglicans. This situation will affect all of us. We dare not let our love for the historic structures of our beloved Communion, important as they are, allow us to destroy its future. We are losing members. We are losing time. We are losing our integrity as an important part of the One, holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

“Multitudes, multitudes, in the valley of decision! For the day of the Lord is near in the valley of decision”. Joel 3:14

+Peter Abuja,

All Saints Day, 2007

Read it all.
H/t to Stand Firm.

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

A sure and strong foundation

Thomas Cranmer

If there were any word of God beside the Scripture, we could never be certain of God’s word; and if we be uncertain of God’s word, the devil might bring in among us a new word, a new doctrine, a new faith, a new church, a new god, yea himself to be a god. If the Church and the Christian faith did not stay itself upon the Word of God certain, as upon a sure and strong foundation, no man could know whether he had a right faith, and whether he were in the true Church of Christ, or in the synagogue of Satan.

Archbishop Thomas Cranmer
(1489-1556)
"Works of Archbishop Cranmer," Parker Society I, p 53
Miscellaneous Writings and Letters of Thomas Cranmer, Archbishop of Canterbury, Martyr, 1556. Ed. John Edmund Cox. Parker Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1846.

H/t to Joe Roberts via Brad Drell.

Bill Boniface: Resignation speech by senior warden of St. Thomas in The Episcopal Church

The resignation speech of Bill Boniface as senior warden of his church, posted on Anglican Mainstream [boldface mine]:

. . . But we’re all adults here. Let’s look at the facts: We live, work and worship together with people of all types and of differing sexual orientations. In the almost eight years my wife and I have attended St. Thomas’, no one to my knowledge has cared one iota who is black or white, old or young, gay or straight. As I said at the beginning, we’re all a family of Christians. And Christians by definition accept all people who come to God. They love one another. Otherwise, they really have no business being called ‘Christians.’

Whether our behaviors will find favor with God when the Day of Judgment arrives is unknown. We only have the Word to go by, and we can follow what Scripture says or not. It’s a personal thing and we’re all in the same boat. I personally hope for my sake that God is a merciful one - or at least has a sense of humor when I arrive! One thing I do know is that I will personally pin my hopes for salvation on what the Apostles passed down, not on a vote at General Convention, past or future, whether they vote away and affirm my own sins or not.

Another popular way to quell dissent is to repeatedly encourage everyone ‘to get back to the things that are really important.’ We should all ‘focus on other things.’ Nonsense. These are hugely important issues and we can address them and still do all the other ‘important’ things. These pleas are simply a way of saying ‘take your eye off the ball and, quick, look over there…!’

The strategy being worked on us depends on two lines of attack, one against society in general, and one against the churches. The strategy against society - like a guerilla war - began subtly and picked up more and more steam as it achieved success over the past four decades. In this case, it’s been over forty years of one small success after another.

The strategy is so brilliant that we should all wish this bunch was directing our war on terrorism today.

The strategy to soften up the society is necessary to lay the groundwork for the strategy on the church, simply because people in churches live in that society.

The Strategy Against Society

Here’s the strategy for the society at large:

Teach the children from an early age through schools and other organizations that making judgments - especially moral ones - is a bad thing (everyone should be unconditionally accepted).

Preach and model moral relativism (what you think is good or bad depends on the situation) at every opportunity; there are no absolutes when it comes to good or evil.

Where debate has been traditionally encouraged, particularly in high schools and colleges, launch a program of ‘political correctness’ to stifle it; stating values or viewpoints other than the ‘correct’ position is not only discouraged, but prohibited.

Give support to hate crimes legislation, then expand it to include hate speech to quiet open dissent, where people may actually be arrested for voicing their views in public; only protect open speech that supports the radical agenda.

Moving the Strategy into the Church

This strategy, which has been highly successful, sets the stage for people’s thinking about the church. Here are some key points to their strategy for the churches:

Find a church of relatively small membership but wide recognition with the most liberal philosophy and the most ‘flexible’ theology: The Episcopal Church

Flood that church with as many radical activists as possible, including ordaining priests.

Build those numbers over years, and combine with activist laity to achieve strategic placements on national church councils and diocesan staffs.

Find the state with the lowest ‘churched’ population of all 50 states in the nation - a ‘weakest link’ - and vote in an activist priest as bishop. New Hampshire.

Force a vote at General Convention to approve his consecration and at the same time another to approve ‘blessing rites’ for non-celibate homosexual partners in spite of the Theology Committee of the House of Bishops recommending strongly against it and almost the entire Anglican Communion pleading with the Episcopal Church not to do it.

Label those who oppose these moves as ‘uninclusive’ and ‘un-Christian’, regardless of whether grounds for either assertion exist.

Paint African and other ‘Two-Thirds World’ Anglicans as ’simple’ and ‘backward’ as reasons for their opposition; like the Apostles, they’re too ’simple’ to understand that the Bible really isn’t correct.

Force those who disagree - clergy and laity - either out of parishes altogether or into submission (use jobs and pensions for leverage against clergy; use church property against laity).

Weaken belief in Holy Scripture:

Teach that Jesus is not the only way to God - Teach that the Gospel has simply been misunderstood all these years - Teach that other religions are equally valid; Christianity holds no sway over others - Affirm all ‘feelings’ and behaviors - Teach that transformation by Jesus is unnecessary; what you want to do is paramount

Ultimately point to the fallacy of the whole Bible, not just selected portions.

Eventually, belief will be sufficiently weakened to support the activist’s ideology that not only do human desire and experience trump Holy Scripture, but that lacking a valid foundation, belief in Jesus is illogical. Transformation from what? Redemption from what? Neither is any longer necessary. ‘Come as you are, stay as you are’ will be the prevailing call. Jesus - and His death for our sins - becomes irrelevant.

The failure of the Episcopal Church or its decline into near irrelevance will be the jumping off point for attacks on other churches until there no longer exists a moral authority which can challenge the elevation of human desire and experience. . .

Read it all.

Robbo: That's Not My Church!

From Robbo at the Llama Butchers:

Since deciding to swim the Tiber, I deliberately have avoided sniping at TEC as she settles beneath the waves. Goodbye to all that, as it were.

Nonetheless, every now and again I see something that grabs my attention again, either exciting anger over what TEC has turned into, or else exciting my admiration for those who continue to fight to either save it from itself (futily, IMHO) or, at least, establish a rearguard to protect as many fleeing refugees as possible. The following exchange of letters does both.

First is Her High Priestessness's "Oi, Ya Got A Nice Diocese There. Be A Shame if Something Happened To It" letter to Bishop Robert Duncan of the Diocese of Pittsburgh (one of the principal orthodox redoubts). . .

I saw this a few days ago. I just luuuuuv it when do-yer-own-thing radicals get all hierarchical n' stuff once they capture the citadel. Cor' lumme, stone the crows.

But I genuinely love Bishop Duncan's "Nuts"-like response to Her High Priestessness:
The Most Revd Katharine Jefferts Schori Episcopal Church Center New York, New York
Dear Katharine,

Here I stand. I can do no other. I will neither compromise the Faith once delivered to the saints, nor will I abandon the sheep who elected me to protect them.

Pax et bonum in Christ Jesus our Lord,

+Bob Pittsburgh

As the Colossus (who sent me both links) put it, "I almost can envision Pope Benedict, riding a tank, a la Patton on the way to Bastogne, upon hearing General McAuliffe’s reply to the Germans: 'A man that eloquent has to be saved.'"

Indeed.

Speaking of which, I haven't done much crossing the Tiber posting of late because I haven't really had that much to say. RCIA goes on apace and all is well - the real heavy hitting won't start until Lent. In the meantime, I read and I study and I pray as best I can.

The Missus is of the opinion that I won't actually go through with it. She's too nice to say so directly, but she thinks that I'm too shallow and not, what, fervent enough to actually make the jump. Well, in one sense she is, of course, absolutely right. I am shallow. I'd also add that I'm frivolous, inconsistent, sinful, worldly and profoundly ignorant of a great many most things. However, I don't see any of this as reason not to join the Church. In fact, quite the opposite: It's the very reason why I should join. . .

Read it all.

Mark Brumley on what unites and divides Catholics and Evangelicals

From the Ignatius Press blog, Insight Scoop:

The Southern Cross, the newspaper of the Diocese of San Diego, interviews Mark Brumley, president and CEO of Ignatius Press, who will be participating in a panel discussion, "Evangelicals and Catholics in Dialogue," at a gathering of The Evangelical Philosophical Society (EPS) during November 14-16:

SC: What is the current topic of dialogue between the Catholics and Evangelicals?

MB: There are a variety of topics under consideration. The unofficial dialogue known as Evangelicals and Catholics Together has looked at such things as justification/ salvation, the nature of the Church and the authority of the Bible. Other topics Evangelicals and Catholics are exploring together are the question of Natural Law/Common Grace, whether contraception is contrary to the moral law -- many Evangelicals are adopting the position of historical Protestantism and are joining with Catholics to say that contraception is wrong.

There has also been a lively discussion, especially on the Evangelical side, of the nature of Tradition, as a norm for belief and practice, and the place of liturgical worship in the Christian life. Catholics are learning from contemporary Evangelical biblical scholarship, which is coming into its own in the era of post-liberal theology. Some Evangelicals have even come out in support of a renewed Evangelical appreciation of Mary -- with some notable caveats in place. Perhaps the most significant area of discussion is how Catholics and Evangelicals can collaborate in evangelization and other forms of cultural engagement.

SC: Has the election of Pope Benedict XVI had any significant impact on the dialogue, or do you expect some impact in the future?

MB: I think it has. A number of Evangelicals have told me that they see Joseph Ratzinger as “one of their own,” in a number of respects. Not least among those respects is Benedict XVI’s appreciation for what Catholic theologian and convert Louis Bouyer called “the positive principles of the Reformation,” as distinct from what he regarded as the negative aspects of it. For Benedict, I think this is underscoring Catholicism’s agreement with classical Protestantism on justification by grace and the divine inspiration of the Bible.

Of course many Evangelicals also appreciate Benedict’s forceful critique of moral and religious relativism. Many are thrilled with his thoughtful engagement of critical issues in biblical scholarship, as expressed in his recent book, Jesus of Nazareth.

I have heard some concerns about the recent CDF document on the nature of the Church, but usually when the document is explained to Evangelicals, they see that it is nothing new. They don’t agree with it, but they understand that it simply restates the Catholic understanding of what a “Church” is.

Read it all.

Show me the numbers

From TitusOneNine, lots of info on ECUSA's membership and attendance decline. One of the more striking graphs shows attendance percentage change from 2000 to 2006.

ECUSA decline 2000-2006; credit TitusOneNine

Update: Oops. The Y axis on this graph should be labeled "% change", not "members". Sorry we didn't catch that before we posted it.

AnglicanTV: Diocese of Pittsburgh video up

Check out AnglicanTV for all the video from the Pittsburgh diocesan convention that you will ever want to see.

Monday, November 05, 2007

Mondays with C.S. Lewis

Those who read poetry to improve their minds will never improve their minds by reading poetry. For the true enjoyments must be spontaneous and compulsive and look to no remoter end.

C.S. Lewis
(Irish author, 1898-1963)
"Lilies That Fester"
The World's Last Night and Other Essays

Translate "crap"

From Katie Sherrod's blog, Desert's Child, a posting of a response by Bishop Barbara Harris to an erroneous identification of her on Stand Firm. Apparently, this response was sent to Elizabeth Kaeton but I haven't been able to verify it on Ms. Kaeton's blog, unless I just missed it. So I only have Ms. Sherrod's statement that this is from Bishop Harris. All I can say is I am speechless that this was written by a Christian bishop. [boldface mine]

Dear Elizabeth,

Thanks for sending me the "report" of my participation in a rally I knew nothing about in a city I have not visited for several years and from a web site and its freak bloggers of which I have never heard. Of course as a Black person I know that we all look alike to many, if not most, white folk, so I am not surprised that a short afro, small glasses. a purple shirt and collar, etc. would peg the person as me. I also have been identified and addressed as The Rev. Dr. Katie Cannon, the Rev. Dr. Kelly Brown Douglas, the Rev. Sandye Williams, the Rev. Mary Adebonojo and several other Black women, twice my size and in no way similar in appearance. But that's the way it goes in this wonderful racist country of ours and this lovely hate-filled church we know and love.

While I do have a concern for Palestinian people, I also have a deep concern for so called "orthodox Anglicans" who think they have cornered the market on revealed truth and righteousness. (They remind me of Fred Phelps and his squad). It must be a heavy burden to be so freakin' right all of the time.

Again, thanks for letting me know what is being said about me these days. Back in 1988 when I was elected bishop the then Episcopal Synod of America said: "The final crisis has come upon the Episcopal Church." Well, here we are almost two decades later and the Church, by the grace of God, continues to press on and will, by Christ's promise, endure.

If you are so inclined, you may pass this on to that wonderfully "Christian" website. I have no clue how to do that myself since I don't get involved in that kind of exchange (translate "crap"). I DO have a life.

Peace, best regards, love and prayers,

+Barbara

Church weddings for unchristened?

From the Sydney Morning Herald (Australia):

The Anglican Church is looking to woo brides and grooms back to their chapels by relaxing the requirement that at least one partner be christened in the church.

Couples are increasingly turning their backs on church weddings, with census data showing only 40 per cent of Australians now choosing to marry in a religious ceremony.

But Australia's second-largest Christian denomination is about to embark on a nationwide debate to determine whether it should solemnise marriages where neither partner is a member of the church.

If the changes are endorsed by church's 23 dioceses, it will be the biggest rewrite of church wedding policy in 25 years.

The Bishop of North Sydney, Glenn Davies, this week called on the church to let local ministers use their discretion and pastoral skills to determine which couples they should marry. "Marriage is not just for Christians, it is God's ordinance for all people," Dr Davies said. "We should rejoice in couples wanting a church wedding and not turn them away because neither party is baptised.

"The Australian church needs to engage with Australian society and we don't want to be rebuffing people who want to marry in a church but can't just because they can't tick the box on baptism. Marriage can point to Christ but let these couples take the journey at their own pace."

The question has divided church leaders, some of whom warn that any such decision could diminish the sanctity of the marriage ceremony and result in ministers being on call to solemnise Japanese tourist marriages and "quickie" weddings.

Opponents say couples who want to say "I do" in a church should be content with a blessing. . .

Divisions on the issue largely cut between evangelicals, who hold only to two sacraments given by Jesus Christ - baptism and Holy Communion - and Anglo-Catholics, who consider marriage holy orders and last rites to be integral ways of partaking in God's grace.

Dr Tim Harris, archdeacon from Adelaide, agreed that relaxing the requirements did not compromise the church's integrity. "Marriage is a gift from God for all humanity," he said. "People who marry outside the church are not any less married than those that are.

Andrew McGowan, warden and president of Melbourne's Trinity College, said it was important to distinguish between church sacraments and ritual and liturgical traditions.

Marriage had been understood to be a sacrament of the church since the 4th century and it was implicit in the 1662 Book of Common Prayer, the authorised standard of worship and doctrine in the Anglican Church, that the parties to a marriage should be members of the church. "Although the church could offer marriage services for non-members they would have to be distinct from the existing sacramental rites to respect the integrity of the church and the participants."

Each diocese is now required to discuss the matter and report back to the next synod in 2010.

Read it all.

Rhode Island Episcopal Diocese votes to go green

Hey boys and girls, it's global warming time! I'm assuming this falls under MDG #7 "Ensure environmental sustainability." From the Phoenix, a press release from Rhode Island Interfaith Power and Light:

In an action unprecedented in its Rhode Island history, the Episcopal Diocese of Rhode Island voted during its recent 217th Annual Convention held October 26-27, ‘that congregations be encouraged to engage in the process of “greening” their churches utilizing the support of faith based organizations’.

The four-point resolution, entitled “Energy conservation and sustainable development”, also calls on “all parishes, missions, and institutions of the Diocese” to have energy audits conducted; encourages Episcopalians to “add their voices of faith” to efforts regarding climate change; and mandates the establishment of a Diocesan task force to study issues of climate change and “function as a resource for education, advocacy, and action”. . .

And it's another task force! Read it all.

Make the most of 'incredible moment,' House of Deputies president tells South Carolinians

From EpiscopalLife Online [boldface mine]:

House of Deputies President Bonnie Anderson urged a group of Episcopalians in the Diocese of South Carolina November 3 to take advantage of an "incredible moment" in the life of that diocese to begin talking to people "whom you may not have talked to recently" so that together they might develop new models for mission.

The moment to which Anderson was referring was created when the Very Rev. Mark Lawrence, the diocese's bishop-elect, recently received the canonically required consent to his ordination and consecration from a majority of the standing committees of the Episcopal Church dioceses and from a majority of bishops with jurisdiction.

"You have some opportunities for newness," Anderson said told nearly 150 who attended the "Connecting with the Episcopal Church in 2007" event sponsored by the Episcopal Forum of South Carolina for which she was the keynote speaker. The meeting took place in Charleston at the Inn at Middleton Place. . .

South Carolina Bishop Ed Salmon spoke during the day-long gathering and participated in a question-and-answer panel that closed the day. Forum President Lynn Pagliaro read the letter of greeting from Lawrence in which the bishop-elect said in part that it was his "firm conviction that in Christ's reconciling work we shall find the key to our unity."

The day was marked by discussions of mission, canon law, the organizational behavior of the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Communion, and the implications of the current tensions in the Episcopal Church. Anderson has been visiting the small number of dioceses whose leadership is at varying stages of positioning their dioceses to disaffiliate from the Episcopal Church. Not all of the members of the dioceses support their leaders' plans. She had spent time in the dioceses of Pittsburgh, Rio Grande, and San Joaquin before her trip to South Carolina.

Connecting Richard Hooker to community, mission

Anderson urged the lay people present, whom she said are the "largest order in the church," to remember their baptismal vows and their call to participate in the ministry of the church. She called for a circular model of ministry in the church rather than "an ideological triangle" that places bishops at the top, followed by the clergy and then laity. . .

Saying that Episcopalians and all Anglicans are related to each other through Hooker, a 16th-century Anglican theologian who argued that scripture, tradition and reason are the threefold Anglican sources of authority, Anderson said "we take strength from the community of saints, and from our community represented here."

"God has given us each other and this peculiar life that we find ourselves in," she said. "This peculiar life that draws us to each other and in some peculiar and holy way tangles us up with the Holy Spirit in a community and relationships that we probably would not choose, prods us into living out our religion and spirituality in that context and then, somehow makes us one."

Salmon, who described himself as trying to live "graciously" as an Episcopalian "on the short end of the stick," acknowledged that there is "profound disagreement" in the Episcopal Church and in his diocese, and predicted that no solution will make everyone happy.

He said he is convinced that the Episcopal Church will not change its stance and that people on all sides of the issues are "deeply convicted about the Gospel upon which they stand."

"What we need to do is deal with each other on that basis," Salmon said.

Facing the communion's challenges [the Rev. Francis] Wade [a member of Anderson's Council of Advice and the recently retired rector of St. Alban's Episcopal Church on the grounds of Washington National Cathedral] told the gathering that one can think of the Anglican Communion as an "amphictyony," a term which means "dwellers around" and describes a kind of community that is formed when various people gather around a common religious center. Saying that both the Hebrews of the Old Testament and the Anglican Communion have such a structure, Wade said that amphictyonies have little glue to them and are fragile when they come under pressure.

The response to pressure is often to attempt to make the center more solid, he said, citing the example of Israel during the times recorded in the Old Testament books between Joshua and Judges. First, he said, the Israelites wanted a prophet and then -- much to God's initial displeasure -- a king. He suggested that attempts to give more authority to the leaders of the Anglican Communion's provinces are another example of this sort of effort.

Wade reviewed the course of the Anglican Communion's consideration of issues surrounding human sexuality and suggested that those who pose the debate's questions in terms of orthodoxy or the authority of Scripture ask the wrong questions. Orthodoxy, he said, is not a constant, but instead "has a growing edge." Questions on the authority of Scripture are often more focused on the authority of the persons who would enforce their own applications of Scripture, he said.

The right question, Wade suggested, is: "is God calling us to a new understanding of human sexuality?" While Wade said he is not certain how to answer that question, he noted that people of faith often arrive at such new understandings "slowly" and "badly," in part because "the language of religion...draws its power from pastoral certainty" often despite "substantial evidence to the contrary."

"What we need to do is to listen to each other and that's very hard to do because our conversations are not dispassionate," Wade said, adding that "God does call us to new understandings, but every new understanding is not God's.". . .

[Sally] Johnson [chancellor for the House of Deputies] reviewed how the Episcopal Church determines membership of dioceses in the wider church, parishes in dioceses and people in parishes. The General Convention votes to accept dioceses into union with it or to allow them to leave, dioceses do the same for parishes, and members take actions to have their baptisms recorded in an Episcopal parish or transferred to another parish when they want to move.

While the General Convention has at times allowed dioceses to leave, Johnson said it is "highly, highly unlikely" that Convention would allow the dioceses currently in dispute with the Episcopal Church to break their union with it.

General Convention, she noted, holds much of the authority in the Episcopal Church, in large part by approving changes to the Constitution and Canons and The Book of Common Prayer. Convention cannot, however, change the doctrine of the Episcopal Church, she said. . .

Read it all.

Why we may boycott Lambeth Conference - Akinola

From the Nigerian Tribune:

. . . Archbishop Akinola said on Sunday in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) in Abuja that “we want more time to reconcile our differences on the thorny issue of homosexuality.”

The Lambeth Conference, a once-a-decade meeting of all Anglican bishops, is usually held in London under the chairmanship of the Archbishop of Canterbury and is slated for June.

According to Akinola, Nigerian bishops had not “fully decided” on whether they would attend.

“At present, the Anglican Church is so divided. There is so much distrust and disrespect. Even basic courtesies are lacking among the bishops.

“What kind of communion do you have when you have bishops from all over the world coming together and you cannot even have fellowship or share the Lord's Supper?” he asked.

“What we are doing now is to tell the authorities in Lambeth Palace (Archbishop of Canterbury) the conditions that must be met if we are to attend.

“The first condition is that all bishops in Nigeria must be invited because, as it is now, they have excluded one bishop.

“We have told them that failure to invite any of our bishops is failure to invite all of us because that one bishop did not make himself a bishop,” he said. . .

Read it all.

A look leftward: Episcopal Church disciplines Akinola Anglicans

From Talk to Action [boldface mine]:

The Episcopal Church is getting tough with an openly schismatic bishop who has been one of the Akinola Anglicans cheered and supported by the neoconservative Institute on Religion and Democracy. Similarly, local breakaway parishes are discovering that they can leave the church, but they can't take it with them. (For those who are not familiar, Nigerian Anglican Archbishop Peter Akinola is a rightwing, vehemently antigay prelate with whom a number of renegade American Episcopal churches are affiliating.)

The Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, Katharine Jefferts Schori warned Pittsburgh Bishop Robert W. Duncan Jr. that he would face civil suits and possible expulsion as bishop if a proposed resolution enabling the diocese to leave the denomination passed during a diocesan convention the other day. But he and the Anglican confederates, voted to secede anyway. . .

The IRD and its affiliates, notably the American Anglican Council have made signficant headway in their decade long march to foment internal factional fighting and secession from the Episcopal Church. So much so, that the IRD now describes its Episcopal program as "Anglican." Here is the first sentence of the IRD's Anglican Action program description.
Anglican Action seeks to promote orthodox teaching and practice within the Episcopal Church.

And there is the rub.

While the IRD trumpets the loss of church members and blames it on liberalism, it similtaneously organizes to pull members, whole congregations and even whole diocese out of the denomination. It is remarkable the double speak they have gotten away with. How can one pretend to be advocating for internal reform, when -- as the IRD has done -- advocate and organize for schism? Or collaborate with those who do? Reform and schism are just are not the same thing. Perhaps epitomizing the IRD approach -- even the staffer for the Anglican Action program is a member of a schismatic church in Virginia. Of course that would be consistent with what the IRD has always been about, as the board and advisory board have always had plurlalities of neo-conservative Catholics, as Andrew Weaver has detailed, as well as been fueled by outside, neoconservative financial interests with no actual interest in the life and health of these churches -- other than that the churches were obstacles to the agendas of their, conservative, neonconservative and religous right grantees. . .

Reporting on the state of the American Episcopal Church and its internal disagreements rarely shines a spotlight on the IRD and Archbishop Akinola, tending to treat the tiny minority conservative dissidents as somehow the victims of deviance from the true orthodoxy at the hands of diabolical liberals. But these matters are about much more than mudpies flung by the factions in an all too human institution. At stake is the generally progressive tradition of the Episcopal Church in America and its capacity to act on that tradition, not to mention billions of dollars in assets -- land, buildings, pension funds, and more. The Episcopal Church is making news today. But as we have frequently discussed here at Talk to Action -- there are similar struggles in all of the major Protestant denominations.

Read it all to get a glimpse of how "reappraisers" view the situation. (And how big are those IRD checks to Stand Firm and Chris Johnson anyway, huummm???)

Remaining committed to Christ's mission even as others choose prodigal path

An article by David Bena, suffragan bishop of CANA, in the Christian Post:

. . . Jesus said, "Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all I have commanded you." On another occasion, he said, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father but by me."

Some in the Church are embarrassed by these words, and try to say that Jesus didn't really say such things. The words seem less politically correct than is comfortable in today's world. I'm glad that we in CANA and the ADV realize that these words actually speak life to us and to all who will believe in Jesus.

These words are vehicles of transformation to all. When we live in Christ we are transformed as we begin to live more in keeping with the life Jesus taught and modeled.

I have made visitations to many orthodox Anglican parishes, and can say with joy that they are keeping the main thing the main thing. While many parishes today try to change the scriptures to fit different lifestyles, CANA and ADV parishes are using the scriptures to change people and the society.

And in the midst of preaching the word, our parishes are also firmly committed to social action. But it is social action with Christ at the center, not on the periphery, and it is having a lasting value.

The new Common Cause Partnership of Churches, dedicated to historic, life-giving teachings, is providing an enthusiastic, orthodox Anglicanism in America: Radical Inclusion; Profound Transformation; Inspired Service. The mission is being carried forth as we care deeply that God's people be found and fed.

While The Episcopal Church seems determined to follow a different path and walk away from the obvious teaching of scripture and the foundational teachings of the faith, we as Anglicans must remain dedicated as strongly to Christ’s mission as a Marine fire team dedicates itself to its mission and to each other.

Read it all.

Sunday, November 04, 2007

Sunday night proverbs


To do what is right and just is more acceptable to the Lord than sacrifice.
Proverbs 21:3

A man who strays from the path of understanding comes to rest in the company of the dead.
Proverbs 21:16

A time to tear and a time to mend

I know a lot has been going on this weekend in Pittsburgh and elsewhere, but I haven't really posted much on it. You can find information at all the usual places. I do appreciate Bishop Duncan's response to the presiding bishop--it's a relief to read something succinct and to the point for a change.

But how much is wheels churning and how much is actual movement forward?

My family went to another church today--not Anglican or ECUSA--as we are in the process of discernment (something that I predict will take many more months), and out of nowhere during the processional hymn I started crying, much to the chagrin of my 11-year-old.

All that was in my mind was why do I have to think about leaving the only church I've ever known? And am I upset because God wants me to stay in the Anglican Communion and we're looking outside, or am I upset because I'm trying to hold on to something that God wants me to let go?

Saturday, November 03, 2007

Rami Ayyad - remembering ‘a genuine martyr’

I'm a few days late with this since it's really an All Souls' Day posting, but check out Cranmer's piece on Rami Ayyad:

Please light a candle today in memory of Rami Ayyad, whom the Bishop of London, the Rt Revd Richard Chartres, called ‘a genuine martyr’.

The murder of the Palestinian-Arab Christian Bookseller casts a tragic light upon the attitudes adopted by major Christian organisations to the problems of the Middle East.

Rami Ayyad was manager of the Palestinian Bible Society Bookshop in Gaza City. He was abducted on Saturday 6th October shortly after closing his shop for the day, and his corpse was found early next morning. His funeral took place the same day. The staff at the Palestinian Bible Society work against a constant backdrop of violence and conflict. They face the threat of attack daily. But they are dedicated to demonstrating the Bible’s life-changing message to the Palestinian people.

According to those who knew him, Rami Ayyad loved to share the Good News. He is described as a smiling, loving big guy, the face of the Bible Society in Gaza, with a heart full of the love of Jesus. We rest in the knowledge that he is now with the Lord, for ‘we know that if the earthly tent we live in is destroyed, we have a building from God, and eternal house in heaven, not built by human hands’ ( 2Cor 5:1).

But here on earth, Mr Ayyad leaves behind a pregnant wife and two young children. He also leaves behind a shocked community of believers.

Mr Ayyad was a witness to his faith in Gaza, which since the Israeli withdrawal has plummeted into violence reminiscent of Beirut in the 1970s: Palestinian self-rule has not fostered peace. His witness in the Holy Land was transformed into martydom at the hands of the militant Islamic fanatics of Hamas - who decree that there shall be no peace until its sectarian brand of Islam is politically, militarily and spiritually triumphant. . .

Read it all.

Christopher Howse: Why should abortion be thought wrong?

From the Telegraph (U.K.) [boldface mine]:

The parliamentary science and technology committee took only scientific evidence before recommending this week that it should be easier to get an abortion; it ruled out ethical input. Yet the hot debate on whether abortion is to be allowed or forbidden cannot be other than ethical. How, then, do we decide if it is right or wrong? . . .

In Britain abortions are running at 200,000 a year, more than a quarter of the number of live births.

Yet Dawn Primarolo, the Health Minister, told the select committee last week that the Government believed that the 1967 Abortion Act "works as intended and doesn't require further amendment".

Works as intended? Remember that there is no "social clause" in the Act.

Decisions are meant to be made on the grounds of the mother's health or damage to the unborn child. In reality abortion is a back-up to contraception, and mothers may be left seriously depressed and anguished by it, their lives blighted for years.

How extraordinary it is that abortion on this huge scale has become a regular part of the British way of life, for the morality of abortion, one might think, was pretty obvious.

Here is a human being that is killed, either in the womb or after induced birth.

It sounds like murder. Of course, once a moral philosopher gets to work on any bad act, the grounds of its badness prove hard to establish.

Normal people can also be illogical. Many suppose that the essential part of doing wrong is to do wrong to someone else.

Yet every ordinary person agrees that to murder someone like you or me is wrong. And once murdered, you or I have no complaint to make. That does not make murder right.

As for the foetus, it is unrealistic to think that the accident of being born bestows human rights on it. It is already being looked after before birth, and doctors can intervene in favour of its health and wellbeing.

Even if one presumed that a foetus at earlier stages – at 12 weeks, say – was not a human being, that would be no moral grounds for killing it. It would be a bit like planting a bomb in a room and, after it had blown someone up, pleading that when you planted the bomb there was no one in the room.

Proponents of abortion sometimes complain that it is religious believers – Muslims or Christians – who make a fuss about the immorality of abortion. But since we humans make such a hash at working out morality for ourselves, we should be grateful that a law from God is discernible. That is the original basis of English criminal law, and we abandon it at the peril of our own consciences.

Read it all.
H/t to TitusOneNine.

How is TEC like Hotel California?

From Bill Kinnon at achievable ends:

"You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave."

Presiding Bish Katharine Jefferts Schori has threatened Pittsburgh Bish Bob Duncan - "if you threaten to leave we'll get rid of you." It begins to sound rather like, "you can't quit, I fire you - but you still report to me." Yikes. And, "oh sure, we're not supposed to sue each other but if you attempt to keep your buildings and property I'll see you in court." Part of what she actually said,
If your course does not change, I shall regrettably be compelled to see that appropriate canonical steps are promptly taken to consider whether you have abandoned the Communion of this Church — by actions and substantive statements, however they may be phrased — and whether you have committed canonical offences that warrant disciplinary action. [from here via Ruth Gledhill]

The standard (and appropriate) response is who abandoned whom? Jefferts Schori, with vast experience as a church leader (she became a priest in '94, was an associate rector before her 2001 appointment as Bish of Nevada - one of the truly large dioceses for TEC - 32 churches in total), is going to use whatever means necessary to protect TEC's hegemony. But, she's not trying to intimidate, according to Rev. George Werner (a former top TEC official), ""Her heart is filled with Jesus." Which Jesus, one might reasonably ask. Perhaps it's "our mother Jesus (who) gives birth to a new creation"?

This past week the Diocese of Pittsburgh passed a motion to begin the process of leaving TEC. My good friend, Jonathan Millard, introduced the motion to the Convention this past week. Jonathan, Rector of Church of the Ascension in Pittsburgh's University district, Oakland, is quoted in the Pittsburgh Gazette this morning,
"At the end of the day, the issues before us aren't about canons and conventions and procedures and lawsuits. They are about the centrality of the cross of Christ."

At the end of the day, this is a battle over the supposed Boomer values of the '60's and the eternal values of the Kingdom. . .

Read it all.

Dryness

That man is perfect in faith who can come to God in the utter dearth of his feelings and desires, without a glow or an aspiration, with the weight of low thoughts, failures, neglects, and wandering forgetfulness, and say to Him, "Thou are my refuge."

George MacDonald
(Scottish author and minister, 1824-1905)
Unspoken Sermons, First Series: The Child in the Mist

H/t to C.S. Lewis.

South Carolina: Episcopal meeting stresses unity

From The State:

Episcopalians from South Carolina’s two dioceses are set to gather in Charleston today in an effort to strengthen connections with the national Episcopal Church.

The conference, sponsored by the nonprofit Episcopal Forum of South Carolina, will feature Bonnie Anderson, president of the church’s House of Deputies. Anderson holds the denomination’s highest lay office.

Lynn Pagliaro, a forum board member, hopes the meeting will ease conflicts, particularly in the more conservative Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina, which represents 75 Lowcountry parishes.

That diocese, soon to be under the leadership of Bishop-elect Mark Lawrence, sought alternative leadership within the national denomination after the 2003 election of a practicing gay bishop.

“Our goal is unity with our bishop and the national church,” Pagliaro said. The forum takes no formal stand on issues. But it is supportive of a broader understanding of theological issues, including the thorny controversies surrounding ordination of gay bishops and same-sex blessings, as it works to avoid schism within the national denomination.

“We point to the diversity that exists within the national Episcopal Church,” he said.

Pagliaro said about 150 people are expected at the Middleton Place Conference Center, including 15 from the Episcopal Diocese of Upper South Carolina, which represents Episcopalians in the Midlands and Upstate.

Read it all.

National Episcopal leader makes Vermont visit

From the Burlington Free Press (if you can bear to read Katharine Jefferts Schori's direct quotes - not only a tin ear, a condescending attitude, and a litigious mind, but now add "lying" to the list when she says "a handful of our church leaders. . .would like to see the church never ordain and never baptize a gay or lesbian person") [boldface mine]:

The leader of the Episcopal Church of the United States said Friday that church dissidents unhappy with the ordination of an openly gay bishop in New Hampshire should refocus their energy on more pressing world problems.

"Obviously a handful of our church leaders are still upset and would like to see the church never ordain and never baptize a gay or lesbian person," said Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, in Burlington to attend the annual convention of the state's 175-year-old Episcopal diocese.

"We need to refocus on more life-and-death issues like starvation, education, medical care."

The Rev. Eugene Robinson was elected bishop of the New Hampshire diocese in 2004, prompting at least four church dioceses to threaten to break away from the church. On Friday, members of the Pittsburgh Episcopal diocese voted heavily in favor of taking a first step toward splitting from the church. The Fort Worth, Texas, diocese is scheduling a similar vote later this month.

Jefferts Schori, who spoke Friday at a forum at the University of Vermont's Ira Allen Chapel, said she had written a letter warning Pittsburgh Bishop Robert Duncan she would discipline him if he continues to support measures that would lead to Pittsburgh's departure from the church.

"It is an unfortunate thing to have to do, but it is a necessary thing to do," she said.

Jefferts Schori said she is also trying to address schisms in the church over her own election in 2006 as the first woman to head the American Episcopal church. Episcopalians are part of the worldwide Anglican community, much of which opposes the ordination of women.

"There are still noises about that," she said. "We're not through with that conversation yet.". . .

Sounds so very soviet unionish - "we're not through with that conversation yet" and all who disagree with her agenda are just "noises." Guess we haven't been to the reeducation camps yet - bah! And, I don't know, salvation of souls sounds pretty life and death to me, but I guess ECUSA is now just a social service agency with a singularly unpleasant director. Read it all.

Bishop Howe writes an open letter to the Presiding Bishop

From TitusOneNine:

Saturday, November 3, 2007

The Presiding Bishop
815 Second Avenue
New York, NY 10017

Dear Katharine,

I have read with great sadness your letter to Bishop Bob Duncan of Pittsburgh. And, since you have chosen to make your letter to him public, I will make this one public, as well.

I have stood shoulder to shoulder with Bob in the efforts of the Network to reverse the course of The Episcopal Church with regard to recent decisions regarding human sexuality. I part company with him in his decision to abandon the commitment we made when we formed the Network, to work "within the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church."

But, Katharine, I cannot support your thinly veiled threat to resort to litigation if the Diocese of Pittsburgh rescinds its accession to the Constitution and Canons of The Episcopal Church.

Dioceses voluntarily join (accede to) The Episcopal Church. And they can voluntarily determine to separate from (withdraw their accession from) The Episcopal Church.

During the Civil War, the Dioceses within the Confederate States withdrew from The Episcopal Church without penalty. They were reunited when that terrible war ended. Perhaps there will be a reunion of presently seceding Dioceses at some point in our future, as well.

But just now, to threaten litigation, especially in the face of the unanimous exhortation from the Primates in Dar es Salaam (an exhortation you agreed to) to end such litigation, is deeply troubling.

I beg you to stand down.

This can only harm our relationships as fellow members of the Body of Christ and our witness to the outside world.

Warmest regards in our Lord,

The Right Rev. John W. Howe
Episcopal Bishop of Central Florida
1017 East Robinson St.
Orlando, FL 32801

AnglicanTV: Pittsburgh diocesan convention day 2

From Kevin:

Today the convention is held at St Mark's Church in Johnstown. There is no wifi at the church so I will not be streaming todays events. I will post the video tomorrow.

Thanks

Friday, November 02, 2007

Heretical Friday: Donatism

Donatism

Named for Donatus Magnus (275?-355?), bishop of Carthage and the leader of the Donatists, a rigorist Early Christian sect in North Africa. The Donatist schism in Africa began in 311 and flourished just one hundred years, until the conference at Carthage in 411, after which its importance waned.

Donatism holds that only those who lead a blameless life can belong in the church or can administer the sacraments.

The primary disagreement between Donatists and the rest of the early Christian church was over the treatment of those who renounced their faith during the persecution of Roman emperor Diocletian (303–305). The Donatists refused to accept the sacraments and spiritual authority of priests and bishops who had fallen away from the faith during the persecution. Many church leaders had gone so far as to renounce Christ to avoid martyrdom, had turned Christians over to Roman authorities, and had handed over sacred religious texts to authorities to be publicly burned. These people were called traditors (“people who had handed over”). These traditors had returned to positions of authority under Constantine I, and the Donatists proclaimed that any sacraments celebrated by these priests and bishops were invalid.

The Donatists, by denying the intrinsic efficacy of the sacraments, claimed the sacraments could be celebrated validly only by those in the state of grace. They required the re-baptism of any Catholic who came over to their sect.

The first question was whether the Sacrament of Penance can effect a reconciliation where the apostate, or in some cases specifically the traditor, may be returned to full communion. The Orthodox Catholic position was that the sacrament was for precisely such cases of reconciliation of the penitent with the Church. The Donatists held that such a crime rendered one unfit for further membership in the Church, a position of extreme rigorism.

The second question was the validity of sacraments confected by priests and bishops who had been apostates under the persecution. The Donatists held that all such sacraments were invalid: by their sinful act, such clerics had rendered themselves incapable of celebrating valid sacraments. This is known as: ex opere operantis — Latin for from the work of the one doing the working, that is, that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the worthiness and holiness of the minister confecting it. The Catholic position was (and is): ex opere operato — from the work having been worked, in other words, that the validity of the sacrament depends upon the holiness of God, the minister being a mere instrument of God's work, so that any priest or bishop, even one in a state of mortal sin, who speaks the formula of the sacrament with valid matter and the intent of causing the sacrament to occur acts validly.

Donatists had the outward forms of Catholicism, including bishops, priests, and deacons, Mass, and the veneration of the relics of martyrs. The heresy of Donatism lay not primarily in the denial of particular Catholic doctrines but in the assertion that only "sinless" men could administer the sacraments validly. The schism was effected by the rejection of the lawful authority of validly-elected Catholic bishops and culminated in illicit but valid ordinations of schismatic bishops, priests, and deacons.

Augustine of Hippo campaigned against Donatism throughout his tenure as bishop of Hippo, and through his efforts the Orthodox Catholic Church gained the upper hand. His view, which was also the majority view within the Church, was that it was the office of priest, not the personal character of the incumbent, that gave validity to the celebration of the sacraments.

Donatism was condemned as a heresy at various councils, most notably the Synod of Arles of 314.

By 411 the Donatists were still quite numerous in Numidia and the rest Northern Africa, but, with their theological errors so completely refuted by Augustine, Optatus, and other Catholic apologists, their vigor waned quickly, though it would take two centuries more before they finally disappeared. Donatism survived the Vandal occupation and the Byzantine reconquest under Justinian I. It is unknown how long this belief persisted into the Muslim period, but some Christian historians believe the Donatist schism and the discord it caused in the Christian community made the military takeover of the region by Islam easier.

Sources:
New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia
Catholic Answers: Donatism
Wikipedia (I know, I know, but everything from this source was checked against another)

Previous heresy posts:
Manichaeism
Gnosticism
Pelagianism

Bishop Duncan responds to the Presiding Bishop

From Stand Firm:

The Most Revd Katharine Jefferts Schori
Episcopal Church Center
New York, New York

Dear Katharine,

Here I stand. I can do no other. I will neither compromise the Faith once delivered to the saints, nor will I abandon the sheep who elected me to protect them.

Pax et bonum in Christ Jesus our Lord,

+Bob Pittsburgh

AnglicanTV: Pittsburgh diocesan convention

From AnglicanTV:


Greetings ATV Fans




Now I haven't tested the connection from the conference center yet, but if it is a good upload speed then we should have no problem.

AAC: A message from Bishop-elect Anderson

Via email [boldface mine]:

Dearly Beloved in Christ Jesus,

Around the world, more and more observers are realizing how seriously the American House of Bishops (HOB) missed the mark in their response to the Dar es Salaam Communique. At the same time the HOB has upset many liberal revisionists within TEC who feel that the HOB should have been bolder in defending TEC's right to chart their own course on the gay and lesbian agenda for the church. These times are truly interesting!

As many of you are aware, some months ago the Anglican Church of Nigeria's House of Bishops elected four new bishops for CANA (Convocation of Anglicans in North America) and the consecration of those four is scheduled for December 9, a Sunday afternoon, at 2 PM at the Church of the Epiphany in Herndon, Virginia.

This will be a great celebration in many ways. It will provide CANA and the Church of Nigeria with additional bishops to minister to the growing flock of Anglican Christians in CANA who are part of the growing orthodox realignment within the larger communion. A second way this celebration is significant is that these consecrations will be (by permission of His Grace Peter J. Akinola) not in Nigeria as is the custom, but in Northern Virginia, in the heart of where one of the great battles for Christian Anglican orthodoxy is underway.

Many former Episcopal Churches have left the liberal and revisionist Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, and in an important theological and practical division have formed new churches under various overseas provinces. Even now the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia and the national Episcopal Church are involved in a massive litigation offensive, suing these faithful churches who have left the heresy of TEC's Virginia diocese.

These CANA consecrations build on the ones recently done in Kenya and Uganda and look forward to the ones in January with AMiA/Rwanda. All are a part of the orthodox family of God equipping the army to go forth and spread the Good News. It is appropriate therefore that in the heart of the Virginia battleground the faithful church gathers to consecrate four new bishops to carry on the defense of the faith.

There will be a five day spiritual retreat for the soon-to-be-bishops and their wives preceding the consecration, and as one of the bishops-elect, I look forward to it as a chance to catch my breath and center in on the entirely new life and task before us.

The division in the church over faith and morality is spreading from parishes to dioceses and even to the provincial level. As we have seen parishes leave TEC to realign with other faithful provinces, now several TEC dioceses are preparing to do the same. Within the global Anglican family severe divisions on the provincial level are also developing, and the Archbishop of Canterbury is approaching the time when he also will have to choose which path he will walk: one of orthodoxy and faith or one of heterodoxy and accommodation. Even now leaked memos from secret Lambeth meetings mention the possibility of officially sanctioning foreign overseas bishops to come into English bishops' dioceses and perform episcopal acts for specific inviting congregations, with or without the explicit permission of the local bishop. If that is approved it would likely avoid the litigious and contentious scene that we see in the USA.

Speaking of contentiousness, there is breaking news within the American Episcopal Church. The Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church has finally acted on complaints against Bishop Charles Bennison of Pennsylvania, complaints that go back many years, pertaining to his purported complicity in keeping the sexual molestation of a child in his church by Bennison's own brother quiet and the information suppressed. It is further alleged that Bishop Bennison, knowing his brother was being ordained a deacon and then a priest, did not divulge the information or cause it to be known.

Why has Jefferts Schori waited until now to inhibit Bennison and start his trial process? The most probable answer is to convey a picture of evenhandedness - for having signed the Bennison papers she wrote Bishop Duncan of Pittsburgh a threatening letter, letting him know that unless he stopped his diocese from passing a change in their canon law allowing Pittsburgh's departure, she would inhibit and depose him (although she says it in formal language: "If your course does not change, I shall regrettably be compelled to see that appropriate canonical steps are promptly taken to consider whether you have abandoned the Communion of this Church - by actions and substantive statements, however they may be phrased - and whether you have committed canonical offences that warrant disciplinary action.")

This threat to Bishop Duncan on the eve of his diocesan convention was, I would assert, the reason why Bennison was inhibited at THIS time, so she can say, "See, I am fair - I discipline the bad boys on both sides equally." What this actually says is fairly horrendous, however. What she is actually saying is that there is parity between being an orthodox, faithful bishop and being involved in child molestation.

In reality Bennison was a convenient sacrificial lamb for Jefferts Schori to use in her attack on Bishop Robert Duncan, and by extension on Bishop Jack Iker and Bishop John-David Schofield, whose dioceses will be taking votes in the near future on their continued relationship with TEC.

I have a mental picture of Captain Schori of the ship TEC Titanic, brandishing an armload of writs, inhibitions and threats, trying to drive people away from the life boats and proclaiming "you must go down with the ship!"

Pittsburgh's diocesan convention is this weekend. Pray most earnestly for Bishop Duncan and all other orthodox leaders.

It is a historic time we are living in. Each night as I say my prayers and close my eyes I wonder "What will tomorrow bring, and what will God do next?"

In Christ,
Bishop-elect David C. Anderson
President and CEO, American Anglican Council

Thursday, November 01, 2007

Frenzied blasphemy

From Ignatius Insight:

Most professed believers cannot conceive of why it should ever be necessary to make sacrifices for their religion, which is why there is almost total indifference to the fate of persecuted believers during one of the great ages of religious persecution in the history of the world.

Authentic religion, precisely because it penetrates so deeply into the being of its adherents, has the capacity to inspire either great love and devotion or great hatred, sometimes one transforming itself into the other. At certain times in history that suppressed hatred bursts out violently, in systematic and frenzied attempts to, as Voltaire is supposed to have urged, "Crush the infamous thing." Such was the French Revolution, the triumph of Communism in Russia, and other episodes.

While particular justifications are offered for this frenzy of annihilation--the privileges of the clergy, ecclesiastical wealth--beneath it all is something which no degree of "reform," nor attempts by Christians to be accommodating, could ever expunge--hatred of a system of beliefs which calls each man's life into question at every moment, which reminds people of the infinite God who judges their every action. It is this which finally is intolerable to a certain kind of mind, which senses that it will not be at peace with itself until every vestige of this transcendent claim has been eradicated. . .
Read it all.
H/t to the WebElf Report.

Shoe Thursday

Brian Atwood suede platform pump
I think it's just a pretty shoe (for a gray day here).